§ Volunteer Form
§ What is Pro-Life Unity?
To achieve Pro-Life Unity we will establish standards that we all agree upon, and efforts that we all regularly participate in. By working together we can challenge the culture of death and the apathy which is pervasive in our society.
§ Action Code
Help promote the Pro-Life Action Calls which are put out by Pro-Life organizations nationwide.
.(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) to email us and we will send you the Action Code & sign you up as a member of Pro-Life Unity. Your site will be listed on the Members page
§ Life Principles
Click here for the timeless Life Principles that were established over 30 years ago by the March for Life Education and Defense Fund.
§ Volunteer Form
Click here to fill out our volunteer form. We can help you identify what you would like to do to help the unborn and connect you with either our efforts our some other group effort somewhere near you
Friday, January 15, 2010
Texas Two-Step, Hutchison-Style
Last night was the live debate between the three Republicans vying for governor: Rick Perry (the incumbent), U.S. Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison, and former Wharton County Republican Party chair, Debra Medina. (The latter doesn’t stand a chance, by the way, but hopefully she doesn’t take votes away from Perry.)
Soon after the debate began, the million-dollar question was asked of Senator Hutchison. I wrote down my own transcript, which speaks for itself:
Dave Montgomery, Moderator: “Could you clarify your position on abortion tonight? Specifically, do you believe that Roe v. Wade should remain enforced or be reversed?”
Sen. Hutchison: “Let me say that my record is one of always coming down on the side of life.” She goes on to name some pro-life legislation she’s supported: voting against taxpayer funding of abortion and partial-birth abortion, promoting adoption, etc. “We have had restrictions on abortion that have become the law of the land, and I think that’s good…I don’t want to have freedom that some states could have partial-birth abortion.”
Mr. Montgomery: “But still, your position on abortion is given some discomfort to Republican activists in your party who take a pretty strong position on reversing Roe v. Wade. Do you believe it should remain in effect?”
Sen. Hutchison: “What concerns me about that is that we then have some states that would allow abortion as the baby is coming out of the birth canal, and I would never support that. I’ve voted against it, I don’t want that to be in any state in our country. That is the reason I have stated that position.”
Shelley Kofler, Moderator: “So you would not support the overturning of Roe v. Wade.”
Sen. Hutchison: “What I’m saying is [audience laughs, clearly seeing through her act] – if it is overturned, you are going to have abortion havens –
Ms. Kofler: “Is that a yes or no to this?”
Sen. Hutchison: “Look, I—I’m just tellin’ you [audience laughs again] why I’m concerned about, um, having it overturned and then have abortion havens, uh, all over our country.”
Mr. Montgomery, after Sen. Hutchison chatters while trying to do a Texas two-step around the real issue: “So keep Roe v. Wade on the books?”
Sen. Hutchison: “Well I think you have to look at what happens if, if it goes away, then every state is allowed to do whatever its state legislation passes.”
Both moderators: “Thank you. Thanks.”
Those are the facts. I think Senator Hutchison’s position on Roe v. Wade is crystal clear: it should not be overturned. That is an unacceptable position for a potential Texas governor, and it’s unacceptable policy for our United States of America.
For an official statement from the Texas Alliance for Life, please visit this link: Texas Alliance for Life
Columnists • Malori Fuchs • News • Pro-Life Unity • Pro-Life Politics • Permalink